AI Search Optimization Case Study Template (2026)

Documenting AI search optimization success requires different metrics and storytelling than traditional SEO case studies. Where conventional case studies track ranking positions and organic traffic, AI search case studies must capture citation frequency, AI brand mentions, and visibility across multiple AI platforms. A well-structured case study template ensures you capture the right data from the start and present results in ways that demonstrate genuine business impact.

According to Marketing Experts Hub's AEO agency guide, proven case studies should provide a verifiable list of companies helped with AI visibility, along with evidence of how they attribute business impact to AEO efforts. This attribution evidence separates credible case studies from vanity metrics.

Case Study Template Structure

Organize information for maximum impact and credibility.

According to AI For Marketings' SEO portfolio guide, effective SEO case studies show traffic, rankings, and other results before and after changes to explain what worked. For AI search specifically, the structure must capture AI-unique metrics alongside traditional measures.

Essential case study sections:

Section	Purpose	Key Elements
Executive Summary	Quick overview	Challenge, solution, results
Client Background	Context setting	Industry, size, starting point
Challenges	Problem definition	Specific AI visibility gaps
Strategy	Approach explanation	Methods and tactics used
Implementation	What was done	Timeline and activities
Results	Outcomes achieved	Before/after metrics
Key Learnings	Insights gained	What worked, what didn't

Before/After Metrics Framework

Capture baseline and improvement data systematically.

AI search metrics to document:

Case Study Metrics Template
├── AI Visibility Metrics
│   ├── Citation frequency (before/after)
│   ├── AI brand mentions per month
│   ├── Platform coverage (ChatGPT, Perplexity, etc.)
│   ├── AI Overview appearances
│   └── Featured snippet ownership
│
├── Traffic Metrics
│   ├── AI referral sessions
│   ├── Traffic by AI source
│   ├── New users from AI channels
│   └── Engagement rate (AI vs overall)
│
├── Conversion Metrics
│   ├── Conversions from AI traffic
│   ├── Conversion rate comparison
│   ├── Lead quality indicators
│   └── Revenue attribution
│
└── Authority Metrics
    ├── Brand mention sentiment
    ├── Citation context quality
    ├── Competitor comparison
    └── Share of voice changes

Executive Summary Template

Lead with results for busy readers.

According to The Spearpoint's AEO guide, citation frequency and AI brand score represent core AEO metrics—tracking how often your brand gets mentioned and cited across answer engines provides directional indicators of visibility and authority recognition.

Executive summary structure:

Executive Summary Template
├── Client Overview
│   └── [Company type] in [industry] with [context]
│
├── Challenge Statement
│   └── [Specific AI visibility problem]
│
├── Solution Applied
│   └── [High-level approach taken]
│
├── Key Results
│   ├── [Primary metric improvement]
│   ├── [Secondary metric improvement]
│   └── [Business impact metric]
│
└── Timeframe
    └── [Duration from start to documented results]

Example format:

"[Company] increased AI search visibility by 340% over 6 months through strategic content restructuring and schema implementation. AI referral traffic grew from 127 to 2,340 monthly sessions, with conversion rates 4.2x higher than traditional organic traffic."

Challenge Documentation

Frame the problem clearly and specifically.

Challenge section elements:

Element	Description	Example
Starting visibility	Baseline AI citation rate	"Zero AI citations in Q1"
Competitive gap	How competitors performed	"Top 3 competitors cited 8x more"
Business impact	What poor visibility cost	"Missing 15% of qualified traffic"
Specific barriers	What prevented success	"No schema, thin content, weak entity signals"

Strategy and Implementation Documentation

Show the methodology that produced results.

According to Conductor's AEO/GEO Benchmarks Report, measuring AI referral traffic, AI search market share, and performance in Google's AI Overviews enables benchmarking against industry-specific KPIs. Case studies should detail which strategies addressed which metrics.

Strategy documentation template:

Strategy Section Structure
├── Research Phase
│   ├── AI visibility audit methods
│   ├── Competitor citation analysis
│   ├── Query/topic identification
│   └── Technical assessment
│
├── Strategic Priorities
│   ├── Priority 1: [Focus area]
│   ├── Priority 2: [Focus area]
│   └── Priority 3: [Focus area]
│
├── Tactical Implementation
│   ├── Content changes made
│   ├── Schema implementations
│   ├── Entity optimization
│   └── Authority building activities
│
└── Timeline
    ├── Phase 1: [Dates] - [Activities]
    ├── Phase 2: [Dates] - [Activities]
    └── Phase 3: [Dates] - [Activities]

Results Presentation Best Practices

Make outcomes clear, credible, and compelling.

Results presentation guidelines:

Use specific numbers - "340% increase" not "significant improvement"
Show before/after - Side-by-side comparisons add credibility
Include timeframes - "Over 6 months" provides context
Segment by platform - ChatGPT results may differ from Perplexity
Connect to business outcomes - Citations → traffic → conversions → revenue
Acknowledge limitations - What couldn't be measured or attributed

Results visualization options:

Visualization Type	Best For	Example
Bar charts	Before/after comparisons	Citation count growth
Line graphs	Trend over time	Monthly AI traffic
Pie charts	Platform distribution	Traffic by AI source
Tables	Multiple metrics	Complete KPI summary
Screenshots	Citation evidence	AI response examples

Attribution and Credibility Elements

Build trust in your documented results.

According to Siege Media's GEO guide, GEO focuses on making content easier for AI systems to find, interpret, and surface. Case studies should demonstrate how specific optimizations led to measurable citation improvements.

Credibility builders:

Third-party verification - GA4 screenshots, Search Console data
Methodology transparency - How metrics were collected
Timeframe honesty - Realistic timelines, not cherry-picked windows
Context acknowledgment - Market changes, algorithm updates
Reproducibility signals - Strategies others could apply

Key Learnings Section

Extract actionable insights for readers.

Learning categories to include:

Key Learnings Template
├── What Worked Best
│   ├── Highest-impact tactic
│   ├── Unexpected win
│   └── Efficiency discovery
│
├── What Didn't Work
│   ├── Failed hypothesis
│   ├── Resource waste
│   └── Course corrections made
│
├── Recommendations
│   ├── For similar situations
│   ├── What to do differently
│   └── Success factors identified
│
└── Future Opportunities
    ├── Unexplored areas
    ├── Scaling potential
    └── Next phase plans

Key Takeaways

AI search optimization case studies require purpose-built templates:

Structure around AI-specific metrics - Citation frequency, AI brand mentions, platform coverage
Document before/after clearly - Baseline measurements enable credible improvement claims
Lead with executive summary - Busy readers need results upfront
Show methodology - Strategy details make results reproducible
Include attribution evidence - Screenshots and third-party data build trust
Extract actionable learnings - What worked, what didn't, what to do next

According to Omnius GEO Industry Report, GEO is about making sure that your content is understood, trusted, and referenced by AI. Case studies that demonstrate this understanding, trust-building, and reference-earning with clear evidence help agencies prove value and help brands benchmark their own optimization efforts. A well-documented case study becomes both a sales tool and a learning resource that compounds in value over time.

Related Articles:

Matt Pru